Chump Bucket
Very
few things in life truly make me want to vomit, however yesterday morning’s breakfast interview with Christopher Pyne very nearly inspired such a violent
physical reaction.
According
to the latest polls, Gillard is preferred PM over Tony Abbott by a long shot.
But it’s not her party’s recent policy announcements that have gotten her over the line, nor is it
Abbott’s spectacular floundering during Leigh Sales’s spectacular and devastating
interview on the ABC 7.30 Program or even on the Today show… no. It’s been
Labor’s cheap shots on Abbott’s character that have reduced the public’s faith
in him.
Diddy-fucking-widdums.
So,
because the party can’t trust him to be on the ABC ever again, Abbott didn’t go
on TV to defend himself, the woefully obnoxious Christopher Pyne did. And how Michael Rowland of Breakfast News
managed to keep a straight face throughout the interview is absolutely beyond
me.
Let’s
have a look at how this played out, blow by blow.
Michael Rowland: The
Opposition's education spokesman Christopher Pyne joins us now from Parliament
House. Mr Pyne, good morning to you. As you would have already seen, Labor
gaining small rises in the primary vote in both polls but in both polls as well
Julia Gillard out rates Tony Abbott as preferred Prime Minister. In the
Newspoll she has a 14-point lead, the biggest lead she's had in more than a
year. How do you read those polls?
All good so far, but that would be because
Christopher Pyne hasn’t opened his mouth. Here he is now:
Christopher Pyne: Good
morning Michael. Well what we're seeing is the politics of personal denigration
writ large in Australia. The Labor Party has spent the last two weeks and the
better part of the last few months demonising Tony Abbott in the same way as
they did Campbell Newman before the Queensland State election.
At this point, I know what you’re thinking. Abbott
never stood in front of a sign that said ‘Ditch the Witch’, nor did he
repeatedly call her a liar/untrustworthy/backstabber etc for the last 2 years?
Nor did he and his party lead a campaign of non-questions about her time at Slater
and Gordon 17 years ago? Nope – didn’t happen. It’s like history has been
completely re-written by a dizzy Poodle. He continues…
Pyne: ...They want to destroy
his character and Tony Abbott is being painted by the Labor Party is not the
Tony Abbott that I know and in fact just this weekend Tony Abbott, as well as
doing interviews and doorstops, spent Saturday doing a controlled burn-off with
his local volunteer fire service and yesterday guided a blind runner to the end
of their first marathon as their partner so the Tony Abbott I know is a caring,
compassionate human individual, a man with a Rhodes scholarship, a man who went
to Oxford and the most experienced would-be Prime Minister in Australia's
history in terms of being in Government.
I’m really sorry I exposed you to that – but it’s
really what he said. Honestly, you couldn’t make this shit up. How he manages
to even utter even a single syllable with a mouth so completely full of Abbott’s
sphincter in itself is an astonishingly remarkable feat. Judging by this I’m pretty sure he has a Tony
Abbott teddy bear in budgie smugglers on his bed. The teddy is one of a limited edition of 2 –
Greg Sheridan has the other. If you’re
wondering what Abbott did the weekend before,
he probably dug that poor bastard’s eyes out so Abbott had something nice to
have said about himself. Now that Pyne has concluded his first bout of
enthusiastic arse-licking, it’s over to Rowland to try and stop himself from
completely pissing himself laughing.
Rowland: Taking into account everything that's gone on in Federal
politics, you believe the polls are solely result of from what you see as the
denigration of Tony Abbott. No super trawler or off shore processing? Nothing
else?
I think he did well there – didn’t laugh AND managed to ask a
decent question.
Pyne: I'm sure there are other aspects to it, but I think the
primary purpose of the Labor Party's campaign of personal denegation of Tony
Abbott in recent weeks has been to drive down his poll numbers. That is working
but I don't think at the end of the day the Australian public will buy a
campaign of personal denegation, of vilification.
That’s funny – I thought that was the Coalition’s ‘main game’.
You know – Gillard and the whole Slater and Gordon thing… and all those ‘questions’?
The ones they couldn’t actually articulate, but they should be answered
nonetheless? I’d have thought that that was what the Coalition was getting at –
denigrating the Prime Minister’s character. But hey, that’s just my take on it. Pyne hasn’t finished though…
Pyne: ...Unfortunately with the
Labor Party, Michael, when they have their backs to the wall and they've tried
everything else, they eventually turn to the chum bucket. That's what we've
seen in the last fortnight. Turning to the chum bucket, throwing as much muck
as they possibly can and hoping some will stick.
Firstly, I just want to let you know that I had no idea what he
was talking about when he said ‘chum bucket’. When I Googled it, apparently it’s
a restaurant in SpongeBob Squarepants. However I suspect he means ‘chumbucket’
which is a bucket which houses fishing bait. So now the Labor party are
throwing old squid at Tony Abbott. They should probably use something stickier.
If they hang around until about 9am tomorrow morning, I may be able to help
them out.
Rowland: Tony Abbott hasn't been guilty of negativity?
This is what happens when you can’t state something (because it
could be perceived as being biased), so you pose it as a question instead.
Pyne: Tony Abbott points out the deficiencies of a very bad
government.
Ok, he didn’t get that one – try again Rowland…
Rowland: He's run a relentless negative campaign, as you know, against
the carbon tax. I'll quote you some of the viewer comments we are getting this
morning. Ron on Facebook: “The public's growing tired of the opposition's
continual negative campaigning”. Helen on Facebook: “People are getting sick to
death with Abbott and his attitude.” What do you say to those concerns amongst
voters?
Ok that should do it.
Pyne: Well what I say to them Michael is that running a campaign
against the carbon tax which the government promised not to introduce before
the election and then introduced it is vastly different from a campaign of
personal vilification of an individual which is what's happened to Tony Abbott
in the past few months. Running a campaign against the carbon tax, against the
government's failed border protection policies, against the government's
inability to explain where the $120 billion is coming from for all their
unfunded promises, that's politics. That's what people in politics should be
doing, holding a government to account, not this campaign of personal
denigration of Tony Abbott that we've seen in recent weeks.
What I’ll say here is that Pyne actually has a point – people want
political parties to actually address politics, not each other. However he has
completely neglected to remember anything about what they’ve dredged up about
Gillard over the last few months.
Rowland: What about the campaign of denigration regarding the Prime
Minister's past as a lawyer?
Ahh thank you – the question equivalent of a money shot.
Pyne: Well the campaign that has been in the papers or the stories
that have been in the papers are based on documents filed in the Federal Court,
based on interviews with the Prime Minister when she was a lawyer at Slater and
Gordon and her senior partners. They surround why she left Slater and Gordon.
In other words, if someone wants to be terrorised by
a political rival, they’d better put pen to paper and make sure it’s
documented.
Pyne: …There are many
questions left unexplained but that wasn't run by the opposition. That was run
by those people involved in that case who were horrified at what's happened so
you can't compare a campaign of personal vilification against a campaign of
holding someone to account for matters that happened some time ago that are
fully documented and you can read ‘The Australian' to get all those stories.
This is bald-faced bullshit, with a sprinkling of a sycophantic
promotion for The Oz. Nice touch, Pyne.
Rowland: It wasn't ignored by
the opposition. Come on, Christopher Pyne, Tony Abbott did pick it up. He used
it to further raise questions about, as he saw it, the Prime Minister's
character.
Rowland’s really struggling to contain his incredulousness at
this point.
Pyne: Michael, you cannot compare the documented Federal Court
documents detailing the involvement of fraud in the Australian Workers Union
several decades ago or in fact 20-odd years ago with a personal campaign of
denigration. Trying to make them relatively the same is really pretty
disgraceful actually. The truth is one is documented fraud in the Australian
Workers Union involving the former boyfriend of the Prime Minister. All of that
is on the record. The rest is sheer conjecture, sheer hearsay, smear and
innuendo and trying to put the two together is really quite wrong.
Has Pyne just said that anything beyond the documented fraud was
conjecture? I think he has. Heaven forbid that anyone engage in conjecture… like, I dunno, the Coalition
did. A lot. For weeks.
Rowland: By saying this is all about the personal denigration of Tony
Abbott, these opinion poll results, are you conceding, Christopher Pyne, that
the opposition's campaign against the carbon tax has been a bit of a squib?
You’ve got a nice curve ball there, Rowland.
Pyne: Well, you ask any Labor member that, Michael. I don't think
you'll find that they think the carbon tax is very popular amongst voters.
Everywhere I go in my electorate voters rail against two things primarily, one,
they absolutely hate the carbon tax and the effect it's having on the cost of
living, on electricity prices in particular and, two, they think it's
extraordinary that the government would have come to power and changed the
border protection laws and we've had tens of thousands of illegal arrivals
since then, 10,000 alone just this year which is now costing us billions of
dollars a year in money we could have been spending on infrastructure or on
other things of importance to the Australian public.
Shorter Pyne: We don’t like the carbon tax, and something
irrelevant about ‘illegal arrivals’ who aren’t even illegal. When all else fails, sing from the song book.
Rowland: Nielsen has Malcolm Turnbull 63% as preferred leader, Tony
Abbott 30%. Are you going to be the one who taps Tony Abbott on the shoulder
therefore, Christopher Pyne?
Pyne: Michael, you can try as much as you like to try and create
leadership tension in the Liberal Party. It just isn't there.
*Bullshit*
Rowland: Coalition voters support Malcolm Turnbull over Tony Abbott.
This isn't just general voters and Labor voters.
Pyne: I'm sure our friends would rather focus on trying to whip up
leadership tensions in the Liberal Party than focus on the fact that Kevin Rudd
is back and bigger than ever and doing his best to try and put himself back on
the agenda. I know the press gallery don't like to write about Labor Party
leadership, they much prefer Liberal Party leadership.
Have you ever seen an article on the leadership in the Labor
Party? Pyne apparently hasn’t. I mean really – what is it like on Planet Pyne?
Don’t you receive The Australian there? You should really put in a word with
Tone, Pyne. I’m sure he can make sure they deliver… even to the outer-fringes
of our galaxy.
Pyne: …The truth is there
isn't any tension in the Coalition at all. Our job is to hold a very bad
government to account and on behalf of the Australian people, try and get
policies in place that will reduce the cost of living, protect our borders,
restore integrity to the government and restore the budget bottom line
Oh yes, “policies”. I’d almost forgotten about them.
Rowland: Do you and Tony Abbott and the rest of the leadership group in
the Coalition, Christopher Pyne, see any need to recalibrate your political
strategy in the wake of these opinion polls?
Pyne: I think we need to keep doing what we do best which is to put
out our own excellent policies like the return of the Australian Building and
Construction Commission, maternity leave scheme, talk about the things that
we're going to do. I think on the weekend Tony Abbott announced that we would
built the Pacific Highway, finish the Pacific Highway at a cost of $5.6
billion, put out our own positive agenda while holding a rotten government to
account and that's what we intend to continue to do.
What you do best? You haven’t been doing a lot of it. According
to Pyne, you get a commission, a road and an old maternity leave scheme. This
is what they’ve come up with in 2 years.
Rowland: Christopher Pyne in Canberra thank you very much for your time
this morning.
Pyne: Pleasure Michael, thank you.
Or, has he would have preferred to have said, "Thanks Michael, my time on your planet has been great. I
recommend the shrimp".
Pyne knows if/when Abbott is given the big heave ho by the party room, so Pyne goes to the back bench with him. This snivelling, whining, prissy muck raking individual has married his political life to Abbotts. There is also the Ashby affair to come.
ReplyDeletePyne is a desperate man, it shows every day, in public in interviews and in the House.
For mine he is a goner, justifiably so.
Pyne and Abbott are a pigeon-pair of carping Howard acolytes whose pious monarchistic self righteous drivel has contributed nothing of substance to the political debate in this country. They will indeed be consigned to the backbench when Malcolm gets hold of the reins, and it can't come soon enough.
ReplyDelete